{"id":338,"date":"2026-06-09T12:38:47","date_gmt":"2026-06-09T12:38:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338"},"modified":"2026-06-09T12:38:47","modified_gmt":"2026-06-09T12:38:47","slug":"scotus-has-the-chance-to-deliver-decisive-blow-to-the-epas-unconstitutional-overreach","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>The EPA under the Biden Administration crafted a cap-and-trade scheme to allocate market share in the multibillion-dollar hydrofluorocarbons industry \u2014 including to \u201cnew market participants\u201d based on the promotion of \u201cequity.\u201d Now, one of the businesses the EPA rendered a market-share loser under the federal agency\u2019s unconstitutional take-over of the hydrofluorocarbon industry seeks review by the Supreme Court. And that pending petition represents a sleeper case that could implode much of the administrative state if it makes it onto the high court\u2019s docket next term.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=336\">Kristen Welker\u2019s Delusional Defense Of Brazen California Election Is Why Everyone Hates The Media<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will conference over the pending petition for review, called a petition for certiorari, in the case of <em>. <\/em>The petitioner, known more widely as Choice Refrigerants, is a small business operating out of Georgia which invested in patented blends of refrigerants for air conditioning and other products in the early 2000s. At the time, the EPA encouraged the development of hydrofluorocarbons to replace the ozone-depleting refrigerants then on the market.<\/p>\n<p>In December of 2020, Congress passed a statute called the AIM Act, short for the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020, which mandated a phasedown in the United States of hydrofluorocarbons using a cap-and-trade program. The AIM Act provided for a phased elimination of 85% of hydrofluorocarbons produced in, or imported to, the United States.<\/p>\n<p>While Congress detailed in the AIM Act the cap for each phase of the plan to reduce hydrofluorocarbons, the statute provided no direction for the EPA to decide who should receive \u201callowances\u201d under the law. With no guidance from Congress, the EPA invented its own standards for doling out allowances, with the EPA reserving millions of allowances for \u201cnew entrants.\u201d The EPA\u2019s final rule from October 5, 2021, also expressly provided multiple times that, in allocating market share, it could consider \u201cequity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The EPA later issued a final rule in July of 2023 to cover allocation of hydrofluorocarbons from 2024 through 2028. That final rule continued to provide for allowances to \u201cnew market\u201d entrants, prejudicing Choice Refrigerants and other businesses to the advantage of those deemed worthy by the Biden Administration.<\/p>\n<p>When Choice Refrigerants challenged the EPA\u2019s scheme, the EPA initially defended its allocation of market-share by  it \u201cwas free to issue the allowances in a reasonable manner, reasonably explained,\u201d based on <em>Chevron <\/em>deference. However, the Supreme Court would later overrule the <em>Chevron <\/em>doctrine \u2014 a doctrine which required courts to defer to an agency\u2019s interpretation of a statute so long as it was reasonable.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Nonetheless, the lower court rubberstamped the EPA\u2019s cap-and-trade program, holding Congress could leave it up to the EPA to decide how to allocate market share. The ramification of this reasoning is truly boundless, as Choice Refrigerants  in its petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court: The lower court\u2019s decision \u201cleaves EPA free to choose which companies may participate in a multibillion-dollar industry, and which may not, based entirely on the agency\u2019s policy preferences, whether grounded in preserving orderly markets, advancing social justice, achieving environmental ends, or bare revenue raising.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the EPA had previously proposed handing out allowance by \u201cprioritizing applications for <em>new <\/em>market entry from \u2018minority- and woman-owned small businesses\u2019 that may have faced \u2018challenges entering the HFC import market due to systemic racism, market-access barriers, or other challenges, . . . .\u2019\u201d While the final rule only spoke of the EPA considering \u201cequity, human dignity, fairness, and distributional considerations\u201d in establishing market share, the government\u2019s reasoning \u2014 if upheld \u2014 would allow federal agencies to decide winners and losers based on race or sex.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=334\">The SEC\u2019s Mass Surveillance Of Investors\u2019 Transactions Violates First Amendment<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The EPA\u2019s entire cap-and-trade scheme is antithetical to America\u2019s free market system, but there is an even more fundamental flaw, which serves as the basis for Choice Refrigerants\u2019 request that the Supreme Court hear its appeal. As noted above, Congress, in passing the AIM Act, said nothing to the EPA concerning who should receive allowances to continue to produce or import hydrofluorocarbons. The lower court just invented its own standard \u2014 a clear violation of our Constitution\u2019s foundational principle that lawmaking authority is vested in the legislative branch, not the unelected bureaucrats that run the EPA and the scores of other federal agencies.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court has branded this concept \u201cthe nondelegation doctrine,\u201d although it stems from Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides: \u201c<strong>All <\/strong>legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, . . . .\u201d However, while Article I, Section 1 vests \u201c<strong>all <\/strong>legislative Powers\u201d in Congress, the Supreme Court currently acquiesces in the delegation of power to agencies so long as the statute establishes an \u201cintelligible principle\u201d to direct the bureaucrat\u2019s exercise of power.<\/p>\n<p>The AIM Act contains no such \u201cintelligible principle,\u201d though, when it comes to divining who is entitled to receive hydrofluorocarbon allowances. Yet, the lower court upheld the EPA\u2019s regulation against Choice Refrigerants\u2019 nondelegation doctrine challenge.<\/p>\n<p>Not only did the lower court err, as Choice Refrigerants argued in its petition for certiorari, but \u201c[m]ultiple Justices have written . . . to underscore the need for \u2018further consideration\u2019 of the rules governing delegations of power to decide important questions of national policy.\u201d And in this regard, the Chief Justice, along with Justices Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas, believe the Supreme Court should  the \u201cintelligible principle\u201d and nondelegation doctrine and return to \u201cthe Constitution\u2019s original meaning and historic practice.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Yet the Supreme Court has, to date, been reticent to reinvigorate the nondelegation doctrine. Choice Refrigerants\u2019 petition, however, presents the perfect opportunity for the high court to return to first principles and make clear that Congress cannot delegate away its power to make the law. Doing so would also solve the teeth-gnashing of late over President Trump\u2019s exercise of control over executive branch agencies, for if the agencies lack the authority to make law, Trump cannot use his Article II power to commandeer the country. When it conferences on June 18, 2026 over Choice Refrigerants\u2019 petition, the Supreme Court will likely have those recent legal battles in mind.<\/p>\n<p>Over the last several years, the current Supreme Court has made great strides in restraining the administrative state by returning to the Constitution\u2019s design of separation of powers. But until the Court addresses the flawed and non-textual nondelegation doctrine, federal agencies will continue to make laws \u2014 and pick winners and losers.<\/p>\n<p>Disclosure: The New Civil Liberties Alliance represents Choice Refrigerants. Ms. Cleveland is <em>Of Counsel <\/em>at NCLA but is not an attorney of record on the case.<\/p>\n<p>Read more <a href=\"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=332\">You Should Control Your Child\u2019s Phone \u2014 Not Silicon Valley<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new petition before the Supreme Court gives it the opportunity to land a decisive blow against the EPA&#8217;s unconstitutional overreach.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":337,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[440],"tags":[1309,1310,515,204,1311,1312,876,519,135],"class_list":["post-338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-scotus","tag-article-i","tag-article-ii","tag-clarence-thomas","tag-constitution","tag-environmental-protection-agency","tag-epa","tag-neil-gorsuch","tag-samuel-alito","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach - Property Transition Media<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach - Property Transition Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A new petition before the Supreme Court gives it the opportunity to land a decisive blow against the EPA&#039;s unconstitutional overreach.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Property Transition Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-09T12:38:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2\"},\"headline\":\"SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-09T12:38:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338\"},\"wordCount\":1118,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/2987beb1fc7946b76c8b0d1258d02377.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Article I\",\"Article II\",\"Clarence Thomas\",\"Constitution\",\"environmental protection agency\",\"EPA\",\"Neil Gorsuch\",\"Samuel Alito\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"SCOTUS\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338\",\"name\":\"SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach - Property Transition Media\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/2987beb1fc7946b76c8b0d1258d02377.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-09T12:38:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/2987beb1fc7946b76c8b0d1258d02377.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/2987beb1fc7946b76c8b0d1258d02377.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1668},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=338#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Property Transition Media\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach - Property Transition Media","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach - Property Transition Media","og_description":"A new petition before the Supreme Court gives it the opportunity to land a decisive blow against the EPA's unconstitutional overreach.","og_url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338","og_site_name":"Property Transition Media","article_published_time":"2026-06-09T12:38:47+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#\/schema\/person\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2"},"headline":"SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach","datePublished":"2026-06-09T12:38:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338"},"wordCount":1118,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/2987beb1fc7946b76c8b0d1258d02377.jpg","keywords":["Article I","Article II","Clarence Thomas","Constitution","environmental protection agency","EPA","Neil Gorsuch","Samuel Alito","Supreme Court"],"articleSection":["SCOTUS"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338","url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338","name":"SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach - Property Transition Media","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/2987beb1fc7946b76c8b0d1258d02377.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-09T12:38:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#\/schema\/person\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/2987beb1fc7946b76c8b0d1258d02377.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/2987beb1fc7946b76c8b0d1258d02377.jpg","width":2560,"height":1668},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=338#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SCOTUS Has The Chance To Deliver Decisive Blow To The EPA&#8217;s Unconstitutional Overreach"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/","name":"Property Transition Media","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#\/schema\/person\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com"],"url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}