{"id":665,"date":"2026-06-29T17:41:26","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T17:41:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665"},"modified":"2026-06-29T17:41:26","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T17:41:26","slug":"supreme-court-allows-lower-court-blockade-on-trumps-federal-reserve-firing-to-remain-in-place","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to halt a lower court blockade against President Trump\u2019s firing of Democrat Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve on Monday. The decision was 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joining the court\u2019s liberal justices in the majority. <\/p>\n

Read more What A 20-Year-Old Convertible With A Broken Roof Taught Me About The Good Life<\/a><\/p>\n

Known as Trump v. Cook<\/em>, the case deals with Trump\u2019s August 2025 decision to fire Cook from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors over allegations that she committed mortgage fraud prior to her time at the agency. Cook\u2019s legal team argued that she was unlawfully removed because she was not afforded a formal removal notice or hearing \u2014 claims which the government contended aren\u2019t required under the \u201cfor cause\u201d removal statute. <\/p>\n

D.C. District Judge Jia Cobb, a Biden appointee, issued an injunction preventing Cook\u2019s removal in September. The Trump administration filed its emergency application asking SCOTUS to permit Cook\u2019s removal while litigation continued after its application to do so was rejected by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. <\/p>\n

In allowing Cobb\u2019s injunction to remain in place, Roberts for the majority that \u201cCongress limited the President\u2019s power to remove Governors for good reason \u2014 \u2018[t]o preserve the independence of the Federal Reserve\u2019 and to continue the \u2018long tradition\u2019 of \u2018monetary policy . . . exercised independent of . . . executive influence.\u201d Any proposed alteration to \u201cthat scheme,\u201d he surmised, \u201cmust come from Congress, not the courts.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThat is why we cannot accept the Government\u2019s contentions in this case. To do so would allow the President to remove a member of the Federal Reserve at any time, for any reason, without any notice before, and without any judicial check after. That would turn for-cause protection into little more than at-will employment,\u201d Roberts wrote.<\/p>\n

The chief justice went on to note that \u201cthe ultimate question\u201d of whether Trump can remove Cook \u201cfor cause will depend in part on the underlying facts.\u201d He further underscored that the court\u2019s decision does not address those facts, \u201cas they have yet to be found or analyzed under the relevant legal standards.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rather, we have simply addressed the parties\u2019 arguments about the appropriate legal standards under which the facts must be evaluated. The application for a stay is denied,\u201d he concluded. <\/p>\n

While joining the majority opinion in full, Kavanaugh authored a concurrence expressing agreement that the court \u201cshould not leave open the question whether the Federal Reserve can remain an independent agency in the wake of\u201d the court\u2019s recent Trump v. Slaughter<\/em> ruling, in which the court held that presidents can remove members of so-called \u201cindependent agencies\u201d like the Federal Trade Commission. He further reiterated concerns he espoused during oral arguments about the Fed\u2019s \u201cindependence\u201d and that \u201c[e]ven temporary uncertainty\u201d about its status could cause potential \u201cpolitical upheaval, including confusion about whether the President could immediately remove multiple Governors at will, as well as turmoil in the U. S. and world economies.\u201d<\/p>\n

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson also authored a concurring opinion, in which she argued that the government\u2019s application for relief \u201ccould be resolved by evaluating the equities alone.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more In Landmark Ruling, Supreme Court Affirms That Presidents Run The Executive Branch<\/a><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the dissent was comprised of multiple opinions. Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett authored solo dissents, while Justice Samuel Alito authored an opinion that Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. <\/p>\n

In expressing disagreement with the majority\u2019s holding, Thomas argued that \u201c[a]pparent mortgage fraud was a \u2019cause\u2019 to remove Cook\u201d and reemphasized a point he raised during oral arguments \u2014 that \u201cthe statute authorizing the President to remove Cook for \u2019cause\u2019 says nothing about notice or a hearing, so it does not require notice and a hearing.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cAny other result would violate Article II of the Constitution, under which the President may remove executive officers at will. The Court makes many policy arguments for an \u2018independent\u2019 banking agency that exercises executive power free from accountability \u2026 but those are ultimately arguments against the Constitution,\u201d Thomas wrote.<\/p>\n

The senior justice additionally argued that federal courts do not possess \u201cthe authority to enter the relief that the Court upholds today.\u201d He aptly noted, \u201cAlthough the Court expresses concern that the President removed a Board member for \u2018the first time in the Federal Reserve\u2019s 111-year history,\u2019 \u2026 it expresses no such concern that it today upholds an injunction against the President\u2019s removal of an executive officer for the first time in the Constitution\u2019s 237-year history.\u201d<\/p>\n

Writing on behalf of himself and Gorsuch, Alito noted the \u201cmany thorny legal questions\u201d at issue in the case and how \u201cthe lower courts \u2026 have passed on very few of these issues and have done so in a preliminary and rushed fashion.\u201d In saying that he would decide the application \u201csolely on the two issues that the District Court addressed\u201d \u2014 whether \u201cfor cause\u201d removal applies to pre-office conduct and whether Trump violated Cook\u2019s due process rights \u2014 he signaled his intent to side with the government because Cobb \u201cresolved those issues incorrectly.\u201d <\/p>\n

\u201cBecause the courts below resolved these two issues incorrectly, I would conclude that the President has shown a likelihood that we would reverse at this preliminary stage, leaving all other issues to be developed on remand in the first instance,\u201d Alito wrote. <\/p>\n

In her opinion, Barrett expressed agreement with several of the points raised by Alito and similarly noted the many unresolved questions that the lower courts did not address \u2014 including whether the \u201cremoval restriction in the Federal Reserve Act [is] constitutional.\u201d In doing so, she argued that the court\u2019s Cook<\/em> ruling \u201cis in serious tension with\u201d its Slaughter<\/em> decision and creates \u201ca special exception \u2018\u201dsanctioned by history\u201d\u2018 and based on the Federal Reserve\u2019s role in setting monetary policy.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cHow can history support both a categorical rule and a carveout? \u2026 Do all the Federal Reserve\u2019s existing regulatory powers have the requisite connection to monetary policy? If not, are they grandfathered in? And is the Federal Reserve unique, or might history sanction other exceptions too? The Court does not say,\u201d Barrett wrote. \u201cFor present purposes, though, the most significant problem is that the Court decides this issue at all \u2014 not to mention the many others covered in its opinion. While a modest approach would have been appropriate, the Court chooses to go big. Its opinion sets precedent on a series of important issues, with implications that extend well beyond this case.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more New Study: Immigration Caused 40% Of Your Rent Hikes Over 10 Years<\/a><\/p>\n

Litigation over Cook\u2019s removal will continue throughout the lower judiciary. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court declined to halt a lower court blockade against President Trump’s removal of Lisa Cook from the Fed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":664,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[440],"tags":[3,2337,2347,2348,2250,2349,2350,445,135,2351],"class_list":["post-665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-scotus","tag-donald-trump","tag-executive-authority","tag-federal-reserve","tag-federal-reserve-board","tag-john-roberts","tag-lisa-cook","tag-presidential-powers","tag-scotus","tag-supreme-court","tag-trump-v-cook"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place - Property Transition Media<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place - Property Transition Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court declined to halt a lower court blockade against President Trump's removal of Lisa Cook from the Fed.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Property Transition Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T17:41:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T17:41:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665\"},\"wordCount\":1125,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/035022ba82bcf65949cd797715a77a2f.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Donald Trump\",\"executive authority\",\"Federal Reserve\",\"Federal Reserve board\",\"John Roberts\",\"Lisa Cook\",\"presidential powers\",\"SCOTUS\",\"Supreme Court\",\"Trump v. Cook\"],\"articleSection\":[\"SCOTUS\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place - Property Transition Media\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/035022ba82bcf65949cd797715a77a2f.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T17:41:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/035022ba82bcf65949cd797715a77a2f.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/035022ba82bcf65949cd797715a77a2f.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1280},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=665#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Property Transition Media\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place - Property Transition Media","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place - Property Transition Media","og_description":"In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court declined to halt a lower court blockade against President Trump's removal of Lisa Cook from the Fed.","og_url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665","og_site_name":"Property Transition Media","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T17:41:26+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#\/schema\/person\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2"},"headline":"Supreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place","datePublished":"2026-06-29T17:41:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665"},"wordCount":1125,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/035022ba82bcf65949cd797715a77a2f.jpg","keywords":["Donald Trump","executive authority","Federal Reserve","Federal Reserve board","John Roberts","Lisa Cook","presidential powers","SCOTUS","Supreme Court","Trump v. Cook"],"articleSection":["SCOTUS"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665","url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665","name":"Supreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place - Property Transition Media","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/035022ba82bcf65949cd797715a77a2f.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-29T17:41:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#\/schema\/person\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/035022ba82bcf65949cd797715a77a2f.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/035022ba82bcf65949cd797715a77a2f.jpg","width":1920,"height":1280},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=665#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Allows Lower Court Blockade On Trump’s Federal Reserve Firing To Remain In Place"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/","name":"Property Transition Media","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#\/schema\/person\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com"],"url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/665\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/664"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}