{"id":845,"date":"2026-07-09T13:37:42","date_gmt":"2026-07-09T13:37:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845"},"modified":"2026-07-09T13:37:42","modified_gmt":"2026-07-09T13:37:42","slug":"judicial-minimalist-john-roberts-violated-procedures-to-write-maximalist-birthplace-citizenship-opinion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845","title":{"rendered":"‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Chief Justice John Roberts has long prided himself on being a judicial minimalist and proceduralist. He wants to preserve the image of the judiciary, and especially the Supreme Court, as an impartial arbiter of cases and controversies.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Read more Young Washington Biopic Highlights Early American Grit<\/a><\/p>\n

Very often, when highly politicized cases connected to Trump have reached the court, Roberts has sought ways to defuse the case without looking like the court picked a side with partisan interest. For example, in the\u00a0.\u00a0<\/em>(2024) case about presidential immunity, Roberts led the majority to rule in favor of Trump but tried to make the opinion about the executive\u00a0as such<\/em>\u00a0and not Trump specifically.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

In the recent\u00a0decision from February, Roberts decided against President Trump\u2019s \u201cliberation day\u201d tariffs on the basis, not of\u00a0constitutional interpretation, but of statutory interpretation. Roberts\u00a0narrowed the question\u00a0to the specific statute in question\u00a0\u2014the International Emergency\u00a0Economic\u00a0Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977\u00a0\u2014 and held the\u00a0president\u2019s\u00a0tariffs were not explicitly authorized by the statute.\u00a0Regardless of the rectitude of this decision, it was the simplest way to rule against Trump and answer the\u00a0narrowest\u00a0legal question\u00a0possible\u00a0in the case.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Similarly, if Roberts can find procedural reasons to not rule directly on the merits of a question but instead push it back to the other branches of government or the lower courts, he is often happy to do so. Consider that the Supreme Court handed down the\u00a0(2025) decision last\u00a0summer,\u00a0a case that originated from President Trump\u2019s executive order on birthplace citizenship. However, in that opinion, the Roberts court merely settled the procedural question about whether district court judges can issue universal injunctions as relief \u2014 though that rebuke of the lower courts has proven basically worthless since \u2014 and the court proceeded to send the case back to the lower courts. It\u00a0proceeded\u00a0back up through the lower courts almost\u00a0immediately, resulting in the Supreme Court\u2019s\u00a0Trump v. Barbara\u00a0<\/em>decision a year\u00a0later on\u00a0the actual merits of the case and the question of birthplace citizenship.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Many similar examples abound.\u00a0The thrust is that Roberts does not want to make it ever appear like the court is taking a substantive stance for some partisan\u00a0side, but\u00a0is simply a neutral arbiter applying the \u201ccolorblind\u201d law in an objective fashion. Many on the right would easily see through this fa\u00e7ade, but Roberts has spent a good part of his career doing everything possible to\u00a0maintain\u00a0it.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Birthplace Citizenship<\/strong>\u00a0<\/h2>\n

Nevertheless, in the\u00a0Trump v. Barbara\u00a0<\/em>decision on birthplace\u00a0citizenship, Roberts\u00a0broke with his own\u00a0habit to write a maximalist opinion\u00a0attempting\u00a0to\u00a0permanently settle the meaning of the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Dissenting Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch both pointed out that there were significant \u201cthreshold impediments\u201d that should have barred the respondents from bringing their challenge before the Supreme Court. The respondents managed to get the district court to certify a \u201cclass that includes \u2018all current or future persons\u2019 subject to the Order indefinitely into the future,\u201d but the court did not verify that every member of this essentially\u00a0global\u00a0<\/em>class of individuals had standing to sue for relief.\u00a0Justice Thomas also argued the respondents had no lawful right of action\u00a0to bring\u00a0this\u00a0suit.\u00a0Lastly, the respondents wanted the courts to invalidate the president\u2019s executive order as unconstitutional\u00a0on its face,\u00a0<\/em>which means there are\u00a0no\u00a0<\/em>circumstances in which it could apply constitutionally. However, this is a very demanding standard, which\u00a0arguably could\u00a0not be met here, since there are at least\u00a0some\u00a0<\/em>individuals for whom the order could apply constitutionally (e.g., children born to alien armies or to foreign spies) even with the majority\u2019s interpretation. Thomas explained, \u201cThe Court, without considering any of these individual circumstances, holds unconstitutional the application of the Citizenship Order in all of them.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Read more If Governments Won\u2019t End No-Fault Divorce, Churches Should Help<\/a><\/p>\n

For\u00a0the average non-lawyer readers, the\u00a0key takeaway is that\u00a0Roberts\u00a0chose to ignore all these procedural obstacles and instead\u00a0move ahead with ruling on the constitutionality of the executive order anyway.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Roberts could have also deferred to Congress, allowing Congress to interpret the meaning of the citizenship clause instead of asserting that to be the prerogative of the judiciary.\u00a0In fact, Justice\u00a0Brett\u00a0Kavanaugh\u2019s short opinion (concurring in the judgment but dissenting in the opinion)\u00a0argued that Roberts and the majority were wrong to interpret the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment\u00a0as they did.\u00a0Instead, he argued that President Trump\u2019s executive order violated merely a\u00a0federal\u00a0statute 8 U.S.C. \u00a71401(a), but\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0<\/em>violate the Fourteenth Amendment\u2019s citizenship clause.\u00a0In short, he did not think the president\u00a0could issue such an order in contravention of the statute, but he argued that Congress can\u00a0and should\u00a0<\/em>amend the statute to solve the problem of birthright citizenship in\u00a0our era\u00a0of mass migration.\u00a0A minimalist approach could have seen Roberts following the path of Kavanaugh\u00a0and siding against Trump on statutory grounds instead of constitutional ones.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yet this did not happen. Jumping over these hurdles outlined by Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, Chief Justice Roberts led the majority (which included the three most liberal justices on the court) in writing a maximalist opinion. Roberts\u2019 opinion claimed to clarify the substantive meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment\u2019s citizenship clause and held that the clause requires birthplace citizenship for any child born within American territory, even if the parents are illegal aliens, birth tourists, or foreign citizens owing allegiance to another nation.\u00a0Clearly, Roberts\u00a0wanted to\u00a0preclude\u00a0this question being revisited in future by other branches of government.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

This is also\u00a0evident\u00a0in the way he whitewashes the history, evidence, and precedents to make it appear as if his understanding of birthplace citizenship is univocally acknowledged in American legal and political history. Thomas and Alito exposed this in their erudite dissents, making a much fuller and more rigorous study of the evidence from the founding era through the Reconstruction era amendments and into the 20th century. Thomas especially shows that the majority simply lies about\u00a0the history\u00a0and presents it as simplistic and one-sided. In fact, Thomas cites far more evidence in favor of his opinion (upholding President Trump\u2019s position) than does the majority in support of theirs.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u2018Now Let Him Enforce It\u2019<\/strong>\u00a0<\/h2>\n

In sum,\u00a0in\u00a0Trump v. Barbara,<\/em>\u00a0the\u00a0chief\u00a0justice\u00a0let slip his\u00a0fa\u00e7ade.\u00a0If he wanted to preserve the legitimacy of the judiciary and find a minimalist path, he could have deferred to Congress or even found ways to\u00a0dismiss the\u00a0case\u00a0upon standing\u00a0grounds\u00a0or narrow the holding of the decision.\u00a0Instead, he showed that he was determined to hear this case regardless of any\u00a0\u201cthreshold\u00a0impediments,\u201d\u00a0to side against President Trump, and to\u00a0permanently settle this question of constitutional interpretation.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Given the\u00a0courts\u00a0are political actors and\u00a0that\u00a0they have weighed in to settle this question\u00a0in a way detrimental to American sovereignty, the\u00a0appropriate response\u00a0is for the other political branches\u00a0\u2014\u00a0President Trump and the Republican-led Congress\u00a0\u2014\u00a0to push back.\u00a0They need not acquiesce in this interpretation, and they\u00a0should\u00a0do\u00a0is necessary to reassert American sovereignty.\u00a0The Supreme Court\u00a0is not the only department of the federal government\u00a0that\u00a0can exercise constitutional interpretation,\u00a0nor should its\u00a0word\u00a0be final, especially in cases\u00a0where\u00a0its\u00a0decisions\u00a0grossly err.\u00a0This fight is far from over.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Read more Grassley: Trump\u2019s DOJ Is The Most Transparent, Shining A Light On Dark Biden-Era Secrets<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Chief Justice Roberts chose to ignore procedural obstacles and move ahead with ruling on the constitutionality of an executive order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":844,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[126],"tags":[1433,290,42,866,515,3,1837,2709,2250,2710,2711,876,2712,519,135,55],"class_list":["post-845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-law","tag-14th-amendment","tag-birthplace-citizenship","tag-birthright-citizenship","tag-brett-kavanaugh","tag-clarence-thomas","tag-donald-trump","tag-executive-order","tag-impartiality","tag-john-roberts","tag-maximalist","tag-minimalist","tag-neil-gorsuch","tag-neutrality","tag-samuel-alito","tag-supreme-court","tag-trump-v-barbara"],"yoast_head":"\n‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion - Property Transition Media<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion - Property Transition Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chief Justice Roberts chose to ignore procedural obstacles and move ahead with ruling on the constitutionality of an executive order.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Property Transition Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-09T13:37:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2\"},\"headline\":\"‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-09T13:37:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845\"},\"wordCount\":1265,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/06f8be4b6508ab22b13250d85e5727f1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"14th amendment\",\"birthplace citizenship\",\"Birthright Citizenship\",\"Brett Kavanaugh\",\"Clarence Thomas\",\"Donald Trump\",\"Executive Order\",\"impartiality\",\"John Roberts\",\"maximalist\",\"minimalist\",\"Neil Gorsuch\",\"neutrality\",\"Samuel Alito\",\"Supreme Court\",\"Trump v. Barbara\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845\",\"name\":\"‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion - Property Transition Media\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/06f8be4b6508ab22b13250d85e5727f1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-09T13:37:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/06f8be4b6508ab22b13250d85e5727f1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/06f8be4b6508ab22b13250d85e5727f1.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":676},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?p=845#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Property Transition Media\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/propertytransitionmedia.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion - Property Transition Media","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion - Property Transition Media","og_description":"Chief Justice Roberts chose to ignore procedural obstacles and move ahead with ruling on the constitutionality of an executive order.","og_url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845","og_site_name":"Property Transition Media","article_published_time":"2026-07-09T13:37:42+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#\/schema\/person\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2"},"headline":"‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion","datePublished":"2026-07-09T13:37:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845"},"wordCount":1265,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/06f8be4b6508ab22b13250d85e5727f1.jpg","keywords":["14th amendment","birthplace citizenship","Birthright Citizenship","Brett Kavanaugh","Clarence Thomas","Donald Trump","Executive Order","impartiality","John Roberts","maximalist","minimalist","Neil Gorsuch","neutrality","Samuel Alito","Supreme Court","Trump v. Barbara"],"articleSection":["Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845","url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845","name":"‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion - Property Transition Media","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/06f8be4b6508ab22b13250d85e5727f1.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-09T13:37:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#\/schema\/person\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/06f8be4b6508ab22b13250d85e5727f1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/06f8be4b6508ab22b13250d85e5727f1.jpg","width":1200,"height":676},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?p=845#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/","name":"Property Transition Media","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/#\/schema\/person\/318e38080556664c79a2d76a6b0894b2","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com"],"url":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=845"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/845\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/844"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/propertytransitionmedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}