‘Judicial Minimalist’ John Roberts Violated Procedures To Write Maximalist Birthplace Citizenship Opinion
Chief Justice Roberts chose to ignore procedural obstacles and move ahead with ruling on the constitutionality of an executive order.
Chief Justice Roberts chose to ignore procedural obstacles and move ahead with ruling on the constitutionality of an executive order.
Xi Jinping understands that a nation unable to decide who enters and who belongs has forfeited the capacity for serious grand strategy.
People are finally starting to appreciate how instrumental Justice Alito is to many of the Supreme Court's consequential decisions.
American citizenship is a priceless inheritance, not a cheap commodity to be harvested by those who wish us harm.
Our 'theater-kid occupied government' routinely attains to new heights of absurdity, as shown in Ketanji Brown Jackson's antiracist screed.
Trump v. Barbara may come to be remembered not as the final word on birthplace citizenship but as another constitutional detour.
The Supreme Court has spoken. Our constitutional conversation should not end there.
Until surrogacy is treated as a threat to national sovereignty, American citizenship is up for grabs by the highest foreign bidders.
The John Roberts-written ruling on birthplace citizenship marks a chief justice who has sacrificed judicial courage at the altar of comity.
Roberts strips away the bonds that give the concept of 'allegiance' meaning, all while claiming the same concept compels him to do so.