SCOTUS Pasting Birth Tourism Into The Constitution Demands A Legal System Rebuild
That a court with six Republican-appointed justices could hand down such an un-American decision indicts America's rogue legal system.
That a court with six Republican-appointed justices could hand down such an un-American decision indicts America's rogue legal system.
The Supreme Court has spoken. Our constitutional conversation should not end there.
The Supreme Court's analysis of citizenship comes from a different universe than the one that motivates birth tourists to chase free stuff.
The John Roberts-written ruling on birthplace citizenship marks a chief justice who has sacrificed judicial courage at the altar of comity.
Roberts strips away the bonds that give the concept of 'allegiance' meaning, all while claiming the same concept compels him to do so.
In a 5-4 ruling, SCOTUS held that the children of illegal aliens born on U.S. soil are entitled citizenship under the Constitution.
The United States used to denaturalize hundreds of people a year for a wide range of offenses, but that number has dwindled in recent years.
Naturalized citizenship should be revoked if someone betrays their oath of allegiance to the United States, according to Sen. Eric Schmitt.
Naturalized citizenship should be revoked if someone betrays their oath of allegiance to the United States, according to Sen. Eric Schmitt.