3 Basic Definitions That Many Lindsay Clancy Pundits Get Wrong
The furor over the Clancy case shows that Americans have little idea what “insanity,” “psychosis,” and other terms mean in the courtroom.
The furor over the Clancy case shows that Americans have little idea what “insanity,” “psychosis,” and other terms mean in the courtroom.
In a sane country, the women professing support for a killer like Lindsay Clancy would be rallying around a grieving widow like Erika Kirk.
The majority badgered and bullied the holdout juror who didn't 'trust the experts' on the 'science' of postpartum psychosis. Sound familiar?
People with sociopathic traits have infiltrated every major institution in society and are heavily rewarded for their antisocial behavior.
The people defending Lindsay Clancy raise serious doubts among the public about whether women can discern right from wrong.
As 'Thank You For Sharing' argues, the problem isn’t that mental health doesn’t get enough attention but that it gets far too much.
Whatever the outcome may be of Clancy's trial, so-called "feminists" revealed themselves to be nothing more than left-wing sociopaths.
If TikTok is what's causing people to side with killers, those people cannot be trusted to look at TikTok, and their brains are broken.
Therapeutic culture and the rise of the helping professions sit at the root of the bizarre rallies outside the Lindsay Clancy trial.
If you're too hormonal to know you shouldn't kill your kids, you're probably too hormonal to vote.