Federal Judge Brinkema Sides With Marc Elias To Kill The Fund That Would Compensate Lawfare Victims
The architects of government weaponization are now in federal court, blocking the fund designed to compensate their victims.
The architects of government weaponization are now in federal court, blocking the fund designed to compensate their victims.
The milquetoast Senate majority, like their Democrat friends, want Trump's anti-weaponization fund killed in its cradle.
A judge blocked the DOJ's anti-weaponization fund after plaintiffs claimed it was discriminatory to help victims of Democrat administrations.
In light of the reported DOJ probe into funding of Carroll's anti-Trump lawsuit, it's worth revisiting the flawed nature of her lawfare.
The Anti-Weaponization Fund is the first serious attempt in a generation to put a price tag on what weaponization of justice has cost people.
Jim Troupis and Dr. Ron Elfenbein, dragged through hell by abusive prosecutors, underscore the need for the DOJ's Anti-Weaponization Fund.
Restitution through the 1776 Fund is just, but structural reforms are essential to deter the weaponization of our government institutions.
A new DOJ lawsuit represents a vital step toward ending an un-American war on disfavored attorneys and defenders of disfavored causes.
"Taken together, you see a playbook not used since Elijah Cummings and the IRS targeting scandal days," PILF's Logan Churchwell said.
What is unfolding is not just partisan hardball but the normalization of constitutional lawfare, justified because it is by the left.