The Supreme Court Doesn’t Have The Final Word On Birthplace Citizenship
The Supreme Court has spoken. Our constitutional conversation should not end there.
The Supreme Court has spoken. Our constitutional conversation should not end there.
Until surrogacy is treated as a threat to national sovereignty, American citizenship is up for grabs by the highest foreign bidders.
The showrunners have changed a story in which two women are the paramount political actors to one where they are impotent moral compasses.
To understand culture, you must know Scripture, regardless of whether you think it divine truth, mere artifact, or mythological nonsense.
The U.S. Supreme Court announced that it will hear two cases challenging state and local "assault weapons" bans later this year.
The Supreme Court's analysis of citizenship comes from a different universe than the one that motivates birth tourists to chase free stuff.
The John Roberts-written ruling on birthplace citizenship marks a chief justice who has sacrificed judicial courage at the altar of comity.
Kaul is trying to use a state law intended to protect the rights of sexual assault victims in his trumped-up prosecution of Trump’s allies.
Roberts strips away the bonds that give the concept of 'allegiance' meaning, all while claiming the same concept compels him to do so.
Under conditions of mass immigration, legal or illegal, birthplace citizenship means the destruction of the nation.