SCOTUS Birthplace Citizenship Decision Is John Roberts’ Roe v. Wade
Trump v. Barbara may come to be remembered not as the final word on birthplace citizenship but as another constitutional detour.
Trump v. Barbara may come to be remembered not as the final word on birthplace citizenship but as another constitutional detour.
The Supreme Court has spoken. Our constitutional conversation should not end there.
Until surrogacy is treated as a threat to national sovereignty, American citizenship is up for grabs by the highest foreign bidders.
The John Roberts-written ruling on birthplace citizenship marks a chief justice who has sacrificed judicial courage at the altar of comity.
Roberts strips away the bonds that give the concept of 'allegiance' meaning, all while claiming the same concept compels him to do so.
SCOTUS's ruling 'is not only contrary to the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, it produces grotesque results,' Alito wrote.
Roberts reimposed the British system of subjecthood that the founders rejected just before the US is set to celebrate its 250th anniversary.
Justices slammed the historical illiteracy of John Roberts, who imposed a 'medieval English 'feudal' principle' on the American people.
In a 5-4 ruling, SCOTUS held that the children of illegal aliens born on U.S. soil are entitled citizenship under the Constitution.
Multiple birth tourism networks across Europe and Africa have been shut down, the State Department announced Wednesday.