SCOTUS Birthplace Citizenship Decision Is John Roberts’ Roe v. Wade
Trump v. Barbara may come to be remembered not as the final word on birthplace citizenship but as another constitutional detour.
Trump v. Barbara may come to be remembered not as the final word on birthplace citizenship but as another constitutional detour.
The only way to ensure we don’t witness abuses of TPS once again is to shut down the questionable program completely.
That a court with six Republican-appointed justices could hand down such an un-American decision indicts America's rogue legal system.
The Supreme Court has spoken. Our constitutional conversation should not end there.
Until surrogacy is treated as a threat to national sovereignty, American citizenship is up for grabs by the highest foreign bidders.
The Supreme Court's analysis of citizenship comes from a different universe than the one that motivates birth tourists to chase free stuff.
The John Roberts-written ruling on birthplace citizenship marks a chief justice who has sacrificed judicial courage at the altar of comity.
Roberts strips away the bonds that give the concept of 'allegiance' meaning, all while claiming the same concept compels him to do so.
Roberts reimposed the British system of subjecthood that the founders rejected just before the US is set to celebrate its 250th anniversary.
Justices slammed the historical illiteracy of John Roberts, who imposed a 'medieval English 'feudal' principle' on the American people.