John Roberts: Presidents Have Executive Power. Also John Roberts: No, They Don’t
Cook and Slaughter reveal a chief justice once again trying to split the baby between constitutional principle and institutional pragmatism.
Cook and Slaughter reveal a chief justice once again trying to split the baby between constitutional principle and institutional pragmatism.
If states enact new statutes every time SCOTUS strikes down the old ones, judicial review becomes little more than an advisory opinion.
Across a pair of decisions, Thomas and Alito rebuked lower courts for sidestepping immigration law and the high court's past rulings.
Justice Alito's majority opinion in Wolford v. Lopez contained everything one would hope for from a strong originalist.
Only Justices Alito and Thomas were willing to hear a case involving the consideration of race and potential Fourth Amendment seizures.
A new petition before the Supreme Court gives it the opportunity to land a decisive blow against the EPA's unconstitutional overreach.
Ketanji Brown Jackson said it's "absolutely a legitimate question" as to whether lower court judges should defy the Supreme Court.
Justices Thomas and Alito blasted SCOTUS on Monday for ducking a pivotal interstate dispute over the issuance of CDLs to illegal aliens.
Thomas and Alito's dissents in Hamm v. Smith show how they work together to move the Supreme Court's jurisprudence in the right direction.