How Congress Can Fix SCOTUS’s Disastrous Birthplace Citizenship Error
Sen. Jim Banks has offered a text-and-precedent-bound response to a decision his opponents assumed had ended the debate.
Sen. Jim Banks has offered a text-and-precedent-bound response to a decision his opponents assumed had ended the debate.
In the post-judicial-filibuster world, intellectual adherence to textualism is no longer sufficient for Republican Supreme Court nominees.
Chief Justice Roberts chose to ignore procedural obstacles and move ahead with ruling on the constitutionality of an executive order.
Our 'theater-kid occupied government' routinely attains to new heights of absurdity, as shown in Ketanji Brown Jackson's antiracist screed.
Trump v. Barbara may come to be remembered not as the final word on birthplace citizenship but as another constitutional detour.
That a court with six Republican-appointed justices could hand down such an un-American decision indicts America's rogue legal system.
The Supreme Court has spoken. Our constitutional conversation should not end there.
The U.S. Supreme Court announced that it will hear two cases challenging state and local "assault weapons" bans later this year.
Roberts strips away the bonds that give the concept of 'allegiance' meaning, all while claiming the same concept compels him to do so.
SCOTUS's ruling 'is not only contrary to the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, it produces grotesque results,' Alito wrote.