How Congress Can Fix SCOTUS’s Disastrous Birthplace Citizenship Error
Sen. Jim Banks has offered a text-and-precedent-bound response to a decision his opponents assumed had ended the debate.
Sen. Jim Banks has offered a text-and-precedent-bound response to a decision his opponents assumed had ended the debate.
In the post-judicial-filibuster world, intellectual adherence to textualism is no longer sufficient for Republican Supreme Court nominees.
Chief Justice Roberts chose to ignore procedural obstacles and move ahead with ruling on the constitutionality of an executive order.
Trump v. Barbara may come to be remembered not as the final word on birthplace citizenship but as another constitutional detour.
That a court with six Republican-appointed justices could hand down such an un-American decision indicts America's rogue legal system.
The John Roberts-written ruling on birthplace citizenship marks a chief justice who has sacrificed judicial courage at the altar of comity.
Roberts strips away the bonds that give the concept of 'allegiance' meaning, all while claiming the same concept compels him to do so.
In a 5-4 ruling, SCOTUS held that the children of illegal aliens born on U.S. soil are entitled citizenship under the Constitution.
While it’s not against the law for a foreign traveler to deliver her baby in the U.S., Gill said it's illegal to 'misrepresent yourself.'